Skip to main content

Consciousness and Death

 

Consciousness arises in the physical brain but is not a physical process. It is a “program” that runs in the brain. And this program is not linked with the brain/body in any fundamental way apart from the fact that it runs on a particular brain situated in a particular body.

This may sound something simple, but the implications are profound. And that explains a lot of the struggles of us conscious beings. Consciousness is not so much a biological evolutionary process – it does not degrade with age as the brain/body does (the degradation that happens in old age is again due to degradation of the hardware). It is an abstract thing – not physical – so there is no such thing as degradation. Prime numbers do not degrade over time, music does not degrade over time – the physical instantiations surely do, but the abstractions do not.

So, consciousness, as an abstraction, does not have “degradation” built into it. But the brain/body does. And therefore death i.e., death of the physical brain/body is such a tragic thing. It is purely a “hardware” death. It is almost like a movie, say “the godfather” is stored on one computer (or one set of reels). And it cannot be copied anywhere because we do not have the technology to do so. Sooner or later the physical computer will degrade and with it “The godfather” will be lost forever. How tragic is that?

But the same thing happens in every human being. It has happened a 95 billion times by some estimates (the total number of humans who have ever lived). What makes it even worse is that the conscious being must make sense of it and knows it will happen. Animals do not “know” they will die in the sense that we do. They do not contemplate death like we do. Because we know, we know that some day this body and brain will stop working and along with that we will stop to exist as well.

We have come up with many different ideas to deal with this and make sense of it. Religions have come up with many ways to handle the idea of death. And it “works” if you believe in it. If you believe that there is an afterlife of some sort, or there is heaven where good people go, then that is a way to make sense of death. But these are just beliefs – they are not theories that are difficult to vary and that have predictive power. So, if epistemology is true, then we cannot take them seriously and I do not.

I used to think that as people get older, they kind of naturally accept their own death as it draws closer. And then when it is time it is much easier since consciousness will have aged in parallel with the body. But, as I have argued above, it is not what happens. Sure, you can incorporate certain ideas into your consciousness which can have the same effect i.e., being better able to accept death. But these ideas are more like “patches” – or painkillers. They do not get to the bottom of it – which is that it is just a tragedy that consciousness must die along with the brain/body i.e., the program must die along with the hardware.

Now, after this somber reflection, comes the optimistic part – there is no law of physics that prohibits consciousness from being downloaded to another hardware. In fact, we know that it must be possible given the universality of computation. It is just a matter of figuring out how. I really do hope this happens in our lifetime (though we cannot predict when it will happen). I for one will sign up for it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

True Essence

My yoga teacher, who knows a lot about me and my story, recently asked me "what do you like about yourself, what is your true essence?". I gave the usual answer that I have been giving myself for most of my life - that I am kind, generous, helpful etc. etc. That was not the answer he was looking for. He said those things are in relation to other people i.e. these traits are what I think other people perceive me as. But what is really MY true essence and what do I like about MYSELF. He gave me a week to think about it. That did get me thinking. I talked to some friends about it over the week. I realised how much of my self-perception is dictated by other people. And it has been like that all my life. What I think of myself is really what I think others think of me. Or what I want others to think of me. But if I take other people out of the equation, what am I? What is my true essence? The more I thought, the more I realised that my true essence is creativity. Looking back...

The limitation of language

Humans developed language as a means of communicating with other tribe members. Language is one of the most important, if not THE most important, reason humans are so successful as a species. It enables us not only to communicate immediate information (e.g. there is a lion in that direction, don't go there) but also form and communicate intricate ideas (e.g. myths, religions). Yuval Hariri in his massively interesting book "Sapiens" talks about how what he calls "fiction" (i.e. stories we humans tell each other) enabled homo sapiens to co-operate in massive numbers (much more than the Dunbar limit of 150) and made us such a successful species. Language was critical in all of that.  I believe the advent of language was what gave the biggest boost to cultural evolution in humans. Humans are the only species that significantly evolve culturally as well as naturally. Cultural evolution is exponentially faster than natural evolution - we homo sapiens effectively ...