Skip to main content

On the fallacy of certainty

In one of my previous posts I talked about randomness and how it impacts us and basically determines why we do what we do. The opposite of randomness is certainty. And this post is on the fallacy of the idea of certainty.

Certainty - mathematically speaking something can be certain only when there is a 100% probability of it happening. And if science has taught us anything, it is that nothing is 100% certain. In fact, there is a distinct non-zero probability that I will experience spontaneously combustion right now as I write this. There is a distinct probability that I will disappear right now from where I am sitting and instantaneously appear perched on the top of Mt Everest (and probably not last there for too long - again probably, not certainly).

So when someone tells you he is certain of something - certain that John is going to arrive late for the meeting as usual, or certain that Chad and Marissa are not going to make it as a couple - ask him if he is certain he is going to be around the very next moment of his existence. And tell him that there is, even though extremely small, a distinct probability that he won't.

I feel like I am repeating my points. But one thing I have realized in my 20 years as a student is that we humans need to hear a message at least a few times before it really sinks in. I am certain of it, or am I?

Change is the only constant - the Buddha said that and there is a lifetime of wisdom in that one sentence. If we can truly grasp it we will be spared a lot of trouble, stress and misery in life. Then why do we chase certainty? If change is good for us, why did we not evolve to expect, appreciate and desire change? Perhaps we are in that process of evolution. I really think we as humans have left evolution far behind. It does impact a lot of the things we do and we are. But for the most part, we have left evolution behind.. It doesn't really apply to us anymore in the sense it applies to other species. There is no space of consciousness, self-awareness in evolution, at least in the way we understand evolution. As per evolution the sole aim of any life is the propagation of life - specifically the propagation of the species to which the individual belongs. However with conscious thought, with the mind we have, the same mind that can contemplate and try to understand the universe that created it, it can't be that simple. Even though we are a social species, we are in fact more individual than any other species I can think of. Each one of us is a unique, self-aware, conscious mind that is capable of a lot of amazing things.

I myself have struggled with letting go of the idea of certainty. For a long time most of my efforts were directed to eliminating uncertainty from my life. I wanted everything to be in its place and work perfectly. And when something, even something very small, went wrong it affected me a lot. It stressed me out, made me unhappy, anxious. It has taken some time but I feel I am more capable of accepting uncertainty now. It is such a liberating feeling. The knowledge that its ok for things to be not ok, for things to be not what you wanted them to be. Every unexpected, uncertain fork in existence leads us somewhere new. Many times somewhere much better, which was never part of the original "plan".  So embrace the uncertainty and let go of the overwhelming desire to chase certainty - there is no greater feeling than the feeling of being finally FREE.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Subconscious communication

We think we communicate mostly with words. But the fact if we don't know exactly how much communication or information exchange is happening on the subconscious level. We understand so little about the brain, and consciousness that this question is unequivocally unanswered - exactly how much information exchange happen on the subconscious level. I think it is far more than we think. The conscious brain is good at reasoning after the fact i.e. coming up with reasons why we think a certain way. And these reasons are not always right - they are just an attempt by the pre-frontal cortex to make sense of how we are feeling at the time. e.g. you meet someone for the first time. There is a lot of information exchange happening. Just you looking at this person, there are processes in your brain forming an idea about this person - they way he looks, the way he walks, the way he moves, the way he smells, the way he talks, his facial expressions etc. etc. there are many other non-verbal data ...

All life is problem solving

 What is happiness? Popper answered this question the best in his answer to what is the meaning of life. "All life is problem solving" Problem in the Popperian sense is not always something bad. Problem can be any unsolved thing that you are working on and the definition is not limited to science, art etc. Raising your kids well is also a problem in this sense, and so is trying to get better at dodgeball. Working on a problem is a process of knowledge creation. So in a sense, life is a process of knowledge creation. What is a good life then? what is a happy life? It is a life where the problems you are working on, the knowledge that you are creating, are interesting to YOU. This is the key here - YOU find these problems interesting and are free of coercion in choosing these problems. This is easier said than done. I wrote about it in an earlier blog post , but I believe most misery (excluding misery due to physical pain/limitations, or psychological issues that are real e.g. ...